牙周膜龈手术的临床应用Ⅱ：异体材料的应用

doi:10.7518/hxkq.2018.02.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

牙周膜龈手术主要用于治疗牙龈退缩,增加临床附着水平和牙龈角化组织（附着龈）,以及牙周美容。近年来牙周膜龈手术技术和材料发展迅速,自体上皮下游离软组织移植术一直被公认为是效果最好和最稳定的术式,但由于存在多手术区的缺点,研究人员也一直在探索代替自体组织的材料。本文主要介绍目前临床常用的几种膜龈手术异体材料：1）同种无细胞上皮基质;2）异种胶原基质;3）重组人血小板衍生生长因子;4）釉质基质衍生物蛋白;5）引导组织再生膜;6）组织工程来源结构。应用异体材料的牙周膜龈手术,不仅避免了自体组织的缺点,有些手术效果可以等同甚至超过自体组织,因此异体材料的应用有着广泛的前景。本文介绍了牙周膜龈手术中常用异体材料的优缺点和适应证,并简要介绍了各种膜龈手术的临床选择思路。

关键词: 牙周, 膜龈手术, 异体材料, 牙龈退缩, 附着龈

Abstract:

The main purposes of periodontal graft surgery include achieving root coverage, improving the clinical attach-ment level and keratinized tissue, and advancing the procedure of periodontal plastic surgery. Autogenous graft, such as sube-pithelial connective tissue graft-based procedure, provide the best outcomes for mean and complete root coverage, as well as increase in keratinized tissue. However, a disadvantage of the procedure is in the location of the operation itself: the additional surgical site (palate). Therefore, clinicians are always looking for graft substitutes. This article will discuss the evidence sup-porting the use of 1) acellular dermal matrix (ADM); 2) xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM); 3) recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor (rhPDGF); 4) enamel matrix derivative (EMD); 5) guided tissue regeneration (GTR); 6) living cellularconstruct (LCC), all of which are used in conjunction with coronally advanced flaps as alternatives to autogenous donor tissue. The decision tree for treatments of Miller recession-type defects are also discussed.

Key words: periodontics, gingival surgery, alternative material, gingival recession, attached gingiva

中图分类号:

R781.4

毛尔加. 牙周膜龈手术的临床应用Ⅱ：异体材料的应用[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2018, 36(2): 117-122.

Mao Erjia. The applications of periodontal gingival surgery. Ⅱ: alternative materials[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2018, 36(2): 117-122.

图/表 4

参考文献 28

[1]	Kasaj A.Gingival recession coverage: do we still need auto-genous grafts[J]. Quintessence Int, 2016, 47(9):775-783.
[2]	Renkema AM, Fudalej PS, Renkema AA, et al.Gingival labial recessions in orthodontically treated and untreated individuals: a case-control study[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2013, 40(6):631-637.
[3]	Patel M, Nixon PJ, Chan MF.Gingival recession: part 1. Aetiology and non-surgical management[J]. Br Dent J, 2011, 211(6):251-254.
[4]	Scheyer ET, Sanz M, Dibart S, et al.Periodontal soft tissue non-root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP regeneration workshop[J]. J Periodontol, 2015, 86(2 Suppl):S73-S76.
[5]	Chambrone L, Faggion CM Jr, Pannuti CM, et al.Evidence-based periodontal plastic surgery: an assessment of quality of systematic reviews in the treatment of recession-type defects[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2010, 37(12):1110-1118.
[6]	Thoma DS, Benić GI, Zwahlen M, et al.A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(Suppl 4):146-165.
[7]	Wei PC, Laurell L, Lingen MW, et al.Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 2. A histological comparative study[J]. J Periodontol, 2002, 73(3):257-265.
[8]	Cummings LC, Kaldahl WB, Allen EP.Histologic evalua-tion of autogenous connective tissue and acellular dermal matrix grafts in humans[J]. J Periodontol, 2005, 76(2):178-186.
[9]	Harris RJ.Clinical evaluation of 3 techniques to augment keratinized tissue without root coverage[J]. J Periodontol, 2001, 72(7):932-938.
[10]	Sanz M, Lorenzo R, Aranda JJ, et al.Clinical evaluation of a new collagen matrix (mucograft prototype) to enhance the width of keratinized tissue in patients with fixed prosthetic restorations: a randomized prospective clinical trial[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2009, 36(10):868-876.
[11]	Nevins M, Nevins ML, Kim SW, et al.The use of mucograft collagen matrix to augment the zone of keratinized tissue around teeth: a pilot study[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2011, 31(4):367-373.
[12]	Cardaropoli D, Cardaropoli G.Healing of gingival recessions using a collagen membrane with a hemineralized xenograft: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2009, 29(1):59-67.
[13]	Thoma DS, Jung RE, Schneider D, et al.Soft tissue volume augmentation by the use of collagen-based matrices: a volu-metric analysis[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2010, 37(7):659-666.
[14]	McGuire MK, Scheyer T, Nevins M, et al. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either purified recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB with beta tricalcium phosphate or connec-tive tissue: a histologic and microcomputed tomographic examination[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2009, 29(1):7-21.
[15]	Brookes SJ, Robinson C, Kirkham J, et al.Biochemistry and molecular biology of amelogenin proteins of developing dental enamel[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 1995, 40(1):1-14.
[16]	Castellanos A, de la Rosa M, de la Garza M, et al. Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions[J]. J Periodontol, 2006, 77(1):7-14.
[17]	McGuire MK, Cochran DL. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 2: histological evaluation[J]. J Periodontol, 2003, 74(8):1126-1135.
[18]	Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U.Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gin-gival recessions. A systematic review[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2014, 41(Suppl 15):S44-S62.
[19]	Cheng GL, Fu E, Tu YK, et al.Root coverage by coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft and/or enamel matrix derivative: a meta-analysis[J]. J Periodont Res, 2015, 50(2):220-230.
[20]	Arweiler NB, Auschill TM, Donos N, et al.Antibacterial effect of an enamel matrix protein derivative on in vivo dental biofilm vitality[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2002, 6(4):205-209.
[21]	Karima MM, Van Dyke TE.Enamel matrix derivative pro-motes superoxide production and chemotaxis but reduces matrix metalloproteinase-8 expression by polymorphonu-clear leukocytes[J]. J Periodontol, 2012, 83(6):780-786.
[22]	Okuda K, Miyazaki A, Momose M, et al.Levels of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 and matrix metalloprotei-nases-1 and -8 in gingival crevicular fluid following treat-ment with enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN)[J]. J Periodontal Res, 2001, 36(5):309-316.
[23]	Alves LB, Costa PP, Scombatti de Souza SL, et al. Acellular dermal matrix graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage in smokers: a randomized clinical study[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2012, 39(4):393-399.
[24]	Pini Prato G, Tinti C, Vincenzi G, et al.Guided tissue rege-neration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal gingival recession[J]. J Periodontol, 1992, 63(11):919-928.
[25]	McGuire MK, Scheyer ET, Nevins ML, et al. Living cellular construct for increasing the width of keratinized gingiva: results from a randomized, within-patient, controlled trial[J]. J Periodontol, 2011, 82(10):1414-1423.
[26]	Miller PD Jr.A classification of marginal tissue recession[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 1985, 5(2):8-13.
[27]	Chambrone L, Tatakis DN.Periodontal soft tissue root cove-rage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP regene-ration workshop[J]. J Periodontol, 2015, 86(2 Suppl):S8-S51.
[28]	Calcagni M, Althaus MK, Knapik AD, et al.In vivo visuali-zation of the origination of skin graft vasculature in a wild-type/GFP crossover model[J]. Microvasc Res, 2011, 82(3):237-245.